Social media erupts as supporters accuse CAF-appointed official of poor officiating and costly errors
Football fans across Africa have launched a wave of criticism against Ghanaian referee Daniel Laryea following his officiating in the high-stakes Nigeria vs Morocco semifinal, with many accusing him of poor judgment and controversial decisions that allegedly influenced the outcome of the match.
Laryea, who was appointed by the Confederation of African Football (CAF) to handle the crucial encounter, came under intense scrutiny as several calls during the game sparked outrage among Nigerian supporters and neutral viewers alike. Key moments, including disputed fouls, penalty appeals, and disciplinary decisions, quickly became trending topics on social media platforms, where fans described the officiating as inconsistent and unfair.
Hashtags related to the match and the referee surged online, with many users calling on CAF to review the officiating performance and enforce stricter accountability for referees handling major continental fixtures. Some former players and football analysts also weighed in, noting that high-pressure matches at the semifinal stage demand clearer application of the rules to protect the integrity of the competition.
Despite the backlash, CAF has yet to issue an official statement addressing the complaints surrounding the match officials. The controversy has once again reignited broader debates about refereeing standards in African football, with fans urging the governing body to invest more in referee training, technology, and transparency.
As emotions continue to run high following the semifinal, attention now shifts to whether CAF will respond to the growing calls for review, while supporters insist that fair officiating remains essential to maintaining trust in African football competitions.
Post a Comment